|
Abstract
| Oral Argument: |
Monday, March 3, 1986 |
| Decision: |
Monday, July 7, 1986 |
| Issues: |
First Amendment, Miscellaneous |
| Categories: |
education, first amendment, freedom of speech,
justiciability, obscenity | |
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
At a school assembly of approximately 600 high
school students, Matthew Fraser made a speech nominating a fellow student for
elective office. In his speech, Fraser used what some observers believed was a
graphic sexual metaphor to promote the candidacy of his friend. As part of its
disciplinary code, Bethel High School enforced a rule prohibiting conduct which
"substantially interferes with the educational process . . . including the use
of obscene, profane language or gestures." Fraser was suspended from school for
two days.
Question
Does the First Amendment prevent a school
district from disciplining a high school student for giving a lewd speech at a
high school assembly?
Conclusion
No. The Court found that it was appropriate for
the school to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive language. Chief Justice
Burger distinguished between political speech which the Court previously had
protected in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)
and the supposed sexual content of Fraser's message at the assembly. Burger
concluded that the First Amendment did not prohibit schools from prohibiting
vulgar and lewd speech since such discourse was inconsistent with the
"fundamental values of public school education."